Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Benghazi’

Hillary

Hillary? Really!. That’s the best Feminists can offer up? Or for that matter the Democrat Party?

We have over 300 million people in this Nation and She is the best bet for President according to Billionaire Buffet. What has happened to this nation? Have we learned nothing from electing her fellow Saul Alinsky sycophant?> Read the Hillary letters to Alinsky,

Put aside her complicity in the Benghazi debacle, put aside her duplicity in trying to cover up her activities in the Rose’s Law Firm. Forget her trying to blame her husband’s perversions on a Right Wing Conspiracy. If you put all that aside (I can’t) lets examine what she has done to earn the right to lead this country.

The only person who has done less to advance the interests of most Americans Is President Obama.She rode  into office on the coattails of her adulterous husband whose flagrant womanizing she has not only tolerated but (like the cookie baking housewives she abhors) in an abject effort to acquire her own political power she has stood by her man, no matter the humiliation to which he has subjected her.

Bill, Bubba, Clinton claims she is the most intelligent woman her has known, that is probably true but to my mind that is damning with faint praise.
Let’s review what she did as First Lady. How about Hillary care, a health plan even the Democrats wouldn’t sign off on. Other than that, like Michelle, she mostly took advantage of the White House Perks, piling up frequent flyer miles on her global vacations for her and Chelsea, sure she stopped in to great applause on various tax payer funded international meetings of various UN sponsored Liberal organizations. But what American policies did that advance? Anywhere?

How about as Secretary of State. More of the same. She made a joke of our policies toward Russia, as has Obama. Hillary is a Obama re-do. Although she doesn’t play golf and talks like a hawk basically we are looking at the same narcissistic, self-indulgent, self adulating, ideologue whose only claim to fame is her ability to sustain her delusions of superior ability among the talking heads in the Democratic party without a smidgen of evidence to support her ambitions.

She thrives in a bubble created by Feminists and Democrats who are as delusional as she is and would rather destroy this country than relinquish their political power.

Biden would do more to forward the interests of this country than this duplicitous whore to power and he would be good for a few laughs, which Hillary has never been

Read Full Post »

Photograph of marijuana plants As hard as I might try,  the only explanation I can find for the actions of the current Administration is a liberal inhaling of smoke from their  plant of choice as well as other drugs.

How else can you explain Hillary’s hallucinations about videos being the root cause of our ambassador’s death in Benghazi?

Or our President thinking he could jabber Putin out of taking over the Crimea (of course President Obama may have just been bending over to show his flexibility)

Or our Attorney General Holder believing he could somehow out maneuver the Mexican Cartels by having our Gun Dealers sell assault rifles to straw men as the DEA turned a blind eye, Or that releasing a bunch of Drug Dealers would improve our prison system.

A dope soaked brain would definitely explain why Sibelius thought she could bluff her way through the Obama care roll out, while all those around her were screaming skepticism

And what else would explain Harry Reid’s maliciously perpetuating obvious slander against conservatives of all stripes while barely restraining his giggles?

Or Michelle and Barrack blithely vacationing from one end of the world to the other as though unaware the country has a 17 trillion-dollar plus debt

Or friends of the earth jetting around the country on Earth Day in order to  promote energy conservation or how could the Robert Redford crowd sit on their Redwood decks surrounding their log cabins discussing how to save our redwoods without any awareness of the  ludicrousness of their actions unless  they were floating on a cloud of marijuana

How else to explain the unbelievable pronouncement from The President himself that there wasn’t even a smidgen of wrong doing involved in the IRS preventing Conservative groups from participating in fund-raising during the 2012 elections,  which of course worked to the Democrats favor and probably led to Obama’s successful return to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave

I don’t know what others might think of what is going on in Washington DC these days but I suggest someone check that haze hovering over Progressives, it is probably the best explanation for what is going on and where our taxes are going, namely to pay for the drug hallucinations of those committed to bringing utopian wet dreams to life.  It should be obvious that a drug laden life jacket is the only thing saving  our current crop of collectivist ideologues from drowning in a sea of hypocrisy.

Read Full Post »

Duty Honor Country on Parade

Duty Honor Country on Parade

The following article gives everyone good reason to question Hillary Clinton’s veracity and thus her fitness to be President. What difference does it make? To me integrity makes a big difference. .

 

By DAN CALABRESE – Bet you didn’t know this.

I’ve decided to reprint a piece of work I did nearly five years ago, because it seems very relevant today given Hillary Clinton’s performance in the Benghazi hearings. Back in 2008 when she was running for president, I interviewed two erstwhile staff members of the House Judiciary Committee who were involved with the Watergate investigation when Hillary was a low-level staffer there. I interviewed one Democrat staffer and one Republican staffer, and wrote two pieces based on what they told me about Hillary’s conduct at the time.

I published these pieces back in 2008 for North Star Writers Group, the syndicate I ran at the time. This was the most widely read piece we ever had at NSWG, but because NSWG never gained the high-profile status of the major syndicates, this piece still didn’t reach as many people as I thought it deserved to. Today, given the much broader reach of CainTV and yet another incidence of Hillary’s arrogance in dealing with a congressional committee, I think it deserves another airing. For the purposes of simplicity, I’ve combined the two pieces into one very long one. If you’re interested in understanding the true character of Hillary Clinton, it’s worth your time to read it.

As Hillary Clinton came under increasing scrutiny for her story about facing sniper fire in Bosnia, one question that arose was whether she has engaged in a pattern of lying.

The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther – and goes much deeper – than anyone realizes.

Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.

Why?

“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”

How could a 27-year-old House staff member do all that? She couldn’t do it by herself, but Zeifman said she was one of several individuals – including Marshall, special counsel John Doar and senior associate special counsel (and future Clinton White House Counsel) Bernard Nussbaum – who engaged in a seemingly implausible scheme to deny Richard Nixon the right to counsel during the investigatio

Why would they want to do that? Because, according to Zeifman, they feared putting Watergate break-in mastermind E. Howard Hunt on the stand to be cross-examined by counsel to the president. Hunt, Zeifman said, had the goods on nefarious activities in the Kennedy Administration that would have made Watergate look like a day at the beach – including Kennedy’s purported complicity in the attempted assassination of Fidel Castro.

The actions of Hillary and her cohorts went directly against the judgment of top Democrats, up to and including then-House Majority Leader Tip O’Neill, that Nixon clearly had the right to counsel. Zeifman says that Hillary, along with Marshall, Nussbaum and Doar, was determined to gain enough votes on the Judiciary Committee to change House rules and deny counsel to Nixon. And in order to pull this off, Zeifman says Hillary wrote a fraudulent legal brief, and confiscated public documents to hide her deception.

The brief involved precedent for representation by counsel during an impeachment proceeding. When Hillary endeavored to write a legal brief arguing there is no right to representation by counsel during an impeachment proceeding, Zeifman says, he told Hillary about the case of Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas, who faced an impeachment attempt in 1970.

“As soon as the impeachment resolutions were introduced by (then-House Minority Leader Gerald) Ford, and they were referred to the House Judiciary Committee, the first thing Douglas did was hire himself a lawyer,” Zeifman said.

The Judiciary Committee allowed Douglas to keep counsel, thus establishing the precedent. Zeifman says he told Hillary that all the documents establishing this fact were in the Judiciary Committee’s public files. So what did Hillary do?

“Hillary then removed all the Douglas files to the offices where she was located, which at that time was secured and inaccessible to the public,” Zeifman said. Hillary then proceeded to write a legal brief arguing there was no precedent for the right to representation by counsel during an impeachment proceeding – as if the Douglas case had never occurred.

The brief was so fraudulent and ridiculous, Zeifman believes Hillary would have been disbarred if she had submitted it to a judge.

Zeifman says that if Hillary, Marshall, Nussbaum and Doar had succeeded, members of the House Judiciary Committee would have also been denied the right to cross-examine witnesses, and denied the opportunity to even participate in the drafting of articles of impeachment against Nixon.

Of course, Nixon’s resignation rendered the entire issue moot, ending Hillary’s career on the Judiciary Committee staff in a most undistinguished manner. Zeifman says he was urged by top committee members to keep a diary of everything that was happening. He did so, and still has the diary if anyone wants to check the veracity of his story. Certainly, he could not have known in 1974 that diary entries about a young lawyer named Hillary Rodham would be of interest to anyone 34 years later.

But they show that the pattern of lies, deceit, fabrications and unethical behavior was established long ago – long before the Bosnia lie, and indeed, even before cattle futures, Travelgate and Whitewater – for the woman who is still asking us to make her president of the United States.

Franklin Polk, who served at the time as chief Republican counsel on the committee, confirmed many of these details in two interviews he granted me this past Friday, although his analysis of events is not always identical to Zeifman’s. Polk specifically confirmed that Hillary wrote the memo in question, and confirmed that Hillary ignored the Douglas case. (He said he couldn’t confirm or dispel the part about Hillary taking the Douglas files.)

To Polk, Hillary’s memo was dishonest in the sense that she tried to pretend the Douglas precedent didn’t exist. But unlike Zeifman, Polk considered the memo dishonest in a way that was more stupid than sinister.

“Hillary should have mentioned that (the Douglas case), and then tried to argue whether that was a change of policy or not instead of just ignoring it and taking the precedent out of the opinion,” Polk said.

Polk recalled that the attempt to deny counsel to Nixon upset a great many members of the committee, including just about all the Republicans, but many Democrats as well.

“The argument sort of broke like a firestorm on the committee, and I remember Congressman Don Edwards was very upset,” Polk said. “He was the chairman of the subcommittee on constitutional rights. But in truth, the impeachment precedents are not clear. Let’s put it this way. In the old days, from the beginning of the country through the 1800s and early 1900s, there were precedents that the target or accused did not have the right to counsel.”

That’s why Polk believes Hillary’s approach in writing the memorandum was foolish. He says she could have argued that the Douglas case was an isolated example, and that other historical precedents could apply.

But Zeifman says the memo and removal of the Douglas files was only part the effort by Hillary, Doar, Nussbaum and Marshall to pursue their own agenda during the investigation.

After my first column, some readers wrote in claiming Zeifman was motivated by jealousy because he was not appointed as the chief counsel in the investigation, with that title going to Doar instead.

Zeifman’s account is that he supported the appointment of Doar because he, Zeifman, a) did not want the public notoriety that would come with such a high-profile role; and b) didn’t have much prosecutorial experience. When he started to have a problem with Doar and his allies was when Zeifman and others, including House Majority Leader Tip O’Neill and Democratic committee member Jack Brooks of Texas, began to perceive Doar’s group as acting outside the directives and knowledge of the committee and its chairman, Peter Rodino.

(O’Neill died in 1994. Brooks is still living and I tried unsuccessfully to reach him. I’d still like to.)

This culminated in a project to research past presidential abuses of power, which committee members felt was crucial in aiding the decisions they would make in deciding how to handle Nixon’s alleged offenses.

According to Zeifman and other documents, Doar directed Hillary to work with a group of Yale law professors on this project. But the report they generated was never given to the committee. Zeifman believes the reason was that the report was little more than a whitewash of the Kennedy years – a part of the Burke Marshall-led agenda of avoiding revelations during the Watergate investigation that would have embarrassed the Kennedys.

The fact that the report was kept under wraps upset Republican committee member Charles Wiggins of California, who wrote a memo to his colleagues on the committee that read in part:

Within the past few days, some disturbing information has come to my attention. It is requested that the facts concerning the matter be investigated and a report be made to the full committee as it concerns us all.

Early last spring when it became obvious that the committee was considering presidential “abuse of power” as a possible ground of impeachment, I raised the question before the full committee that research should be undertaken so as to furnish a standard against which to test the alleged abusive conduct of Richard Nixon.

As I recall, several other members joined with me in this request. I recall as well repeating this request from time to time during the course of our investigation. The staff, as I recall, was noncommittal, but it is certain that no such staff study was made available to the members at any time for their use.

Wiggins believed the report was purposely hidden from committee members. Chairman Rodino denied this, and said the reason Hillary’s report was not given to committee members was that it contained no value. It’s worth noting, of course, that the staff member who made this judgment was John Doar.

In a four-page reply to Wiggins, Rodino wrote in part:

Hillary Rodham of the impeachment inquiry staff coordinated the work. . . . After the staff received the report it was reviewed by Ms. Rodham, briefly by Mr. Labovitz and Mr. Sack, and by Doar. The staff did not think the manuscript was useful in its present form. . . .

In your letter you suggest that members of the staff may have intentionally suppressed the report during the course of its investigation. That was not the case.

As a matter of fact, Mr. Doar was more concerned that any highlight of the project might prejudice the case against President Nixon. The fact is that the staff did not think the material was usable by the committee in its existing form and had not had time to modify it so it would have practical utility for the members of the committee. I was informed and agreed with the judgment.

Mr. Labovitz, by the way, was John Labovitz, another member of the Democratic staff. I spoke with Labovitz this past Friday as well, and he is no fan of Jerry Zeifman.

“If it’s according to Zeifman, it’s inaccurate from my perspective,” Labovitz said. He bases that statement on a recollection that Zeifman did not actually work on the impeachment inquiry staff, although that is contradicted not only by Zeifman but Polk as well.

Labovitz said he has no knowledge of Hillary having taken any files, and defended her no-right-to-counsel memo on the grounds that, if she was assigned to write a memo arguing a point of view, she was merely following orders.

But as both Zeifman and Polk point out, that doesn’t mean ignoring background of which you are aware, or worse, as Zeifman alleges, confiscating documents that disprove your argument.

All told, Polk recalls the actions of Hillary, Doar and Nussbaum as more amateurish than anything else.

“Of course the Republicans went nuts,” Polk said. “But so did some of the Democrats – some of the most liberal Democrats. It was more like these guys – Doar and company – were trying to manage the members of Congress, and it was like, ‘Who’s in charge here?’ If you want to convict a president, you want to give him all the rights possible. If you’re going to give him a trial, for him to say, ‘My rights were denied,’ – it was a stupid effort by people who were just politically tone deaf. So this was a big deal to people in the proceedings on the committee, no question about it. And Jerry Zeifman went nuts, and rightfully so. But my reaction wasn’t so much that it was underhanded as it was just stupid.”

Polk recalls Zeifman sharing with him at the time that he believed Hillary’s primary role was to report back to Burke Marshall any time the investigation was taking a turn that was not to the liking of the Kennedys.

“Jerry used to give the chapter and verse as to how Hillary was the mole into the committee works as to how things were going,” Polk said. “And she’d be feeding information back to Burke Marshall, who, at least according to Jerry, was talking to the Kennedys. And when something was off track in the view of the Kennedys, Burke Marshall would call John Doar or something, and there would be a reconsideration of what they were talking about. Jerry used to tell me that this was Hillary’s primary function.”

Zeifman says he had another staff member get him Hillary’s phone records, which showed that she was calling Burke Marshall at least once a day, and often several times a day.

A final note about all this: I wrote my first column on this subject because, in the aftermath of Hillary being caught in her Bosnia fib, I came in contact with Jerry Zeifman and found his story compelling. Zeifman has been trying to tell his story for many years, and the mainstream media have ignored him. I thought it deserved an airing as a demonstration of how early in her career Hillary began engaging in self-serving, disingenuous conduct.

Disingenuously arguing a position? Vanishing documents? Selling out members of her own party to advance a personal agenda? Classic Hillary. Neither my first column on the subject nor this one were designed to show that Hillary is dishonest. I don’t really think that’s in dispute. Rather, they were designed to show that she has been this way for a very long time – a fact worth considering for anyone contemplating voting for her for president of the United States.

By the way, there’s something else that started a long time ago.

“She would go around saying, ‘I’m dating a person who will some day be president,’” Polk said. “It was like a Babe Ruth call. And because of that comment she made, I watched Bill Clinton’s political efforts as governor of Arkansas, and I never counted him out because she had made that forecast.”

Bill knew what he wanted a long time ago. Clearly, so did Hillary, and her tactics for trying to achieve it were established even in those early days.

Read Full Post »

Barack Obama

Barack Obama (Photo credit: jamesomalley)

Does President Obama prevaricate or  lie? Is he disingenuous, or actually  stupid?  Or is he just deliberately  ignorant of how his Administration works.? As Hillary would say “WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE’!!!!!!

The affordable health care program has obviously been a fraud from its inception..  No one really read it because they didn’t need too.  The big secret is that the program was designed to fail from the beginning and the Democrats were in on the scam.  No one  wanted to read it and then have to say they were in on the joke played on the American People.

Why would I say this? I say this  because it is becoming more and more apparent that the whole point of shoving this program down America’s throats was to destroy the private insurance companies so that America would beg the Government to provide Universal Health Care for them.  You think I am making this up,  well then explain why supposedly otherwise brilliant people would take three years to develop a software program they knew would fail then insist on putting it up on the web anyway.   Why would they make regulations demanding the Insurance companies change their plans,  pretend they didn’t know millions would lose their plans because of their regulations,  then try and blame the Insurance companies for having changed their plans and insist they change them back – no insurance company can survive this kind of manipulations, and this Administration knew that from the beginning.

President Obama talks about phony scandals but there was nothing phony about Benghazi except for the President’s rationalizations about the attack, there was nothing phony about the IRS targeting members of the Taxed Enough Already Party except the Administrations excuses for having developed such a policy , there was nothing phony about the Justice Department going after a Fox reporter except the dodges that the Administration took to escape responsibility for criminally pursuing a reporter for doing his job.  And there was nothing phony about Republicans trying to repeal OBAMACARE,  it was OBMACARE itself that was PHONY!

This Administration’s Czars may not be brilliant but they are too clever by half and obviously will use any tactic to accomplish the fulfillment of their utopian wet dream. We have an administration that believes Government is God and you shall not put any other God’s before them. their ethics are those professed by  Communists,  namely situation ethics – which in essence states  “In any given situation what ever I do to advance my own interests is ethical” thus you can lie, cheat, steal from the people and call it social justice.

Robbing Peter to buy Paul’s votes is not social justice.  And what ever some teachers from Notre Dame might believe Jesus did not support BIG Government.  He did not believe Government was responsible for taking care of our Neighbor in need,  Jesus preached that  we individually thru personal sacrifice for our own salvation were expected to look to the needs of  our fellow-man.

I don’t know what it will take for ordinary people to realize that they only suffer greatly under all large central governments such as those of  Caesar, Napoleon, Mao, Stalin, Hitler, and now   Obama —–Bloated,  centralized  Governments such as Obama is creating with his plan to dramatically change America  is not your friend,  never was your friend, never will be your friend.  Big centralized government is  all about Power for Control Freaks who could care less about anyone but themselves.

 

Read Full Post »

House Majority Leader Tom DeLay was dubbed The...

House Majority Leader Tom DeLay was dubbed The Hammer for his enforcement of party discipline and retribution against those who did not support the legislative agenda of President George W. Bush. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Finally after all these many years the Democrats are caught out on their political prosecution not just of the tea party through the IRS but the leader of the opposition to progressive dictatorship,  Tom Delay.  The bug terminator who brought his talents to Congress.

No wonder the Democrats want an ever bigger Government,  they use it to their advantage at every turn,  protecting their own blunders such as Benghazi, Obama care , scandalous paybacks to their contributors and bundlers for DNC re-election campaigns through stimulus packages and favorable exclusions to the Obamacare regulations.   Basically they lie cheat and steal and pad their nests through Government agencies and the more they lie the more our mainstream press swears to it.  Then they turn around and use the  Government to  falsely prosecute any opponent to their skullduggery and their sycophants in the  press either ignore their transgressions or whips the party line into disingenuous parroting of their spin.

We are being scammed and yet it is we who are treated as pariahs by the press when we complain.  Do we have to have another revolution to get back to the Government our forefathers passed on to us?

Read Full Post »

Our System of Government is being raped, pillaged and ultimately decimated by this Administration and all we get from most of the Media is White House Spin, and Collusion in the Stonewalling of the actual criminal neglect of responsibility, and approbation for the outright lies flippantly permeating the story lines produced by President Obama, Hillary Clinton, Eric Holder and a plethora of czars, appointees and sycophants.

“There was nothing that could have been done to aid the Victims in Benghazi”,  Horse hockey,  hundreds of decorated active duty and retired military openly disagree, including ex Seals.  “Benghazi was just a protest aggravated by some video” which ninety percent of the participants could not have possibly even seen.  That’s two obvious prevarications.  Then they add salt to the wound by calling it a “phony” scandal that had nothing to do with the White House,  the fact that the President was more interested in preparing for his next campaign stop for fund-raising than what was happening in Benghazi is scandal enough.   The only phony part of the story is the Administrations purported  concern for the victims.

As for the IRS deliberately interfering with Conservative Groups efforts to get financing for their efforts to exercise their freedom of speech; That is so wrong, especially since the only point was to to manipulate the 2012 elections in favor of President Obama.  Voter fraud pales in comparison, let’s not forget the media’s complicity in foisting this Administration on us, Crowley during the debates defending Obama’s spin on Benghazi.

Then of course we have Holder claiming he would never seek an indictment of a working reporter,  that is unless they are connected to Fox.  Also,  lets not forget his claim that he knew nothing about the scam to promote gun control by permitting  dealers selling of guns to drug dealers in Mexico and then claiming  the Mexican Drug Cartels successes were due to loose gun controls in this country.  That’s not just deceitful,  its diabolical. And the deliberate harassment of AZ officials because they wanted to improve security on their borders,  and Texas officials who sought to improve safety for women seeking abortions, or trying to prevent voter fraud by requesting identification cards at voting booths.

As for the basically unconstitutional application of regulations and policies of Obama care, now that  alone rates incarceration of  many within the Administration for dereliction of duty and downright fraud. Yet the Senate won’t even work with Congress on getting it repealed.  Kids staying on Mommy’s and Daddy’s insurance tit till 26? Only some one on disability should even think of such a thing. Transferring ones health care from one job to another could easily be handled without inundating the taxpayer with additional costs. What we need is for those unable to afford decent health care to be subsidized for catastrophic medical expenses,  anything less than that they can work out a pay off with Drs. and Hospitals. Also tort reform would reduce the attempts of ambulance chasers to drive perfectly competent Drs. into bankruptcy.

First 100 days of Barack Obama's presidency

First 100 days of Barack Obama’s presidency (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

This Administration would have most of its Appointees in jail and the President impeached if our current crop of so-called journalists and media elites  had the integrity, decency and honesty to pursue the derelictions of President Obama and his cohorts with a quarter of the energy they devoted to driving Dick Nixon out of office.  This Nation cannot survive even three more years of this Administration’s bamboozling of the citizens of this Nation, (citizens of every race, ethnicity and religion) just to satisfy some progressive wet dream.  It seems to me the only ones who understand the threat are the  so-called obstructionists in Congress who are fighting for less government and more personal freedom from Big Government. May their tribe increase before all is lost.

Read Full Post »

English: Barack Obama signing the Patient Prot...

English: Barack Obama signing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act at the White House (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

I am beginning to think we have a White House full of Psychopaths.  They talk a good game about compassion for all, but from what I see they are all hat and no horse.

We have a failed President talking about phony scandals?   Benghazi a “phony” scandal?  Four brave and productive Americans needlessly  killed in a Shark like feeding frenzy.  Obviously precautions could have and should have been made to prevent such an attack after the State Dept and surely the President were made aware that all foreign embassies and personnel were targets of terrorist in Lybia.  Instead of protecting our overseas personnel this Administration spins a ludicrous tale about some obscure  video  initiating a protest of Muslim citizens!  Obviously a childish attempt   to cover up the ineptitude of the State Department and the Pentagon. Are we to believe that a spontaneous  protest of  irate Muslim citizens would include rocket launchers and sub machine guns?   Meanwhile our ever astute President’s main concern seem to have been to  get a good nights sleep so he could  wow his groupies at his next fund-raising event.

And then these self-serving,  power-hungry ideologues put salt in the wound by referring to Benghazi as a Bump in the Road, (White House Spin)),  followed by a Screeching declaration of “What difference does it make? (Hillary Clinton,  our Sec of State) and now we have “A Phony Scandal” (The President of the United States}

How about other Phony Scandals.   The IRS ordered to deliberately forestall the approval of 501 status to Conservative Groups in order to prevent them from acquiring sufficient funds to promote their views during the 2012 elections, obviously using the IRS as an arm of the Obama re-election campaign.  A Phony Scandal? What a Crock!

And while we are at it how about the Sibelius manipulations of Medicaid and Medicare,? Talk about pushing grandma off a cliff to pump up the President’s major legislative achievement.  Cut Medicare and Medicaid to make it look at though Obama care is saving the Government money. Meanwhile insulting the Catholic Church and its Bishops but demanding they bow to Secularists abortion priorities.  Maybe that isn’t considered a scandal but it should be.  Of course a bigger scandal is Notre Dame giving an honorary degree to one of the Nations  biggest Abortion legislators in the country President Obama.

The Appointees and Czars of this Administration are touted as the Best and the Brightest this Nation has to offer,  if that is actually true this Nation is beyond redemption. They may be smart but from where I sit they seem a bubble off plum at best and probably psychopathic to say the least.

Then how about playing the Racist Card   from the White House purportedly to support Trevor Martin but in real politics a blatant effort to  distract from the mounting evidence the IRS was engaged in aiding the President’s re-election campaign and fuel for the racial conflict political profiteers.  Stirring up mobs for political gain is probably an even more disgusting use of Presidential Power and more than just a scandal, I call it criminal.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

%d bloggers like this: